Skip to main content

The smallest gold train in the world

There’s a cannon in the Kremlin so big it’s never been fired in anger; no cannon ball has ever left its cavernous aperture. The Tsar Cannon keeps guard, uselessly, as waves of tourists stream past. Just down the path lies the Tsar Bell, the largest bell ever cast. But a huge, ten ton chunk broke off during the casting and its note has never sounded. They’re both massive and imposing, and designed only ever to be those. 

The Kremlin is full of such stuff, spanning the mega, the mini, and all in between. Elsewhere there were swords, regalia, thrones, helmets, shields, and guns. All owned by Prince this and Tsar that. There was a throne for the twin Tsars, complete with a secret compartment from which their mother and regent could whisper to them. And then, as if it were totally normal, you stumble into a side room and come eye to eye with a fully stuffed horse.

The best bit was the royal carriages. These ornate wooden traps, often entirely gilded, or painted a deep maroon, were splendid, though it was the wheels, gigantic and spindly, both glamorous and somehow nervous at the same time, that stuck with me most. There was even a carriage given as a gift from James I in 1604. I felt a strange twinge of pride: here was a bit of England in the Kremlin. The Tsar’s sleighs, used for winter transport, seemed as if they’d sprung from the pages of fairytales. 




The Hermitage had been talking the language of money. The Armoury was too. It had it all, save one thing whose ghostly presence I felt most keenly when gawping at the Faberge eggs. Crafted by Carl Faberge and his workshop and used as gifts from Tsar to Tsarina, these are objects of beauty and miniaturist precision. They spoke the word opulence with a mouth of gold. 

The Trans-Siberian Egg, perhaps the most remarkable Faberge, created to celebrate the opening of the Trans-Siberian railway, had within its ‘shell’ a solid gold train, studded with diamonds and affixed with rubies as headlights. The egg was produced in 1900. When such huge swathes of the country were destitute (as they long had been), their rulers were investing their money in toy trains made of gold. But things were changing in Russia in the 20th century, as soon the Romanovs would learn. 

The Armoury had a good claim to contain all the material wealth and history of Russia, excepting two most humble implements: nondescript, and utterly interchangeable. And it was them that brought all that money, finery, and power crashing down. You could stare long and hard at the Trans-Siberian Egg, but look up quickly and you might just catch, in the reflection of the cabinet glass, a glimpse of the hammer and sickle.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bloody politics

We’re all fox-hunters. It’s just some of us are more honest than others. These days we sneer at past generations and their blood sports: Roman gladiatorial contests; early-modern bear-baiting; Victorian bare-knuckle boxing. And we have a point. Those sports prized the blood-spatter. Ignore your conscience briefly, though, and imagine what the spectators might have felt. An almost giddy thrill, plus deep relief: thank god it was not your blood in the sand. But even to indulge this thought experiment feels wrong. That past is foreign.  I class fox, deer, and bird hunting in that same group. I think they're outdated, outmoded, and will soon be out of fashion. I also don’t think I’m alone in this – look at the huge reaction to the Tory manifesto commitment to repeal the fox hunting ban. Hunting is part of a bloodsport world sustained by an aspect of human nature that is disappearing. That's why I scoffed when I read Gilbert White, an otherwise astute observer, say the fo...

Cliffe notes; autumn changes

The following is a briefing on UK politics I wrote for my boss, Matthew Parris, on Tuesday 18th, covering the previous ten days.  The air is chillier here now, and not just because of Autumn. Since you’ve been away, EU talks have stalled further. No Deal has risen in prominence. The prospect of economic disaster seems more real, and more worrying, than ever before. This is a step change. Speaking personally, the consequences of Brexit have always felt quite abstract for me. They still do, partly because there seem so many possible outcomes, but No Deal is beginning to get under my skin. Even worse is the problem we’ve had since the referendum: no big figure in either main party is willing to tell the truth, at least while the prospect of their own personal success still glimmers. But when has politics ever been different? The referendum, as we’ve said, changed those rules and those laws, but nobody seems to have noticed, and personal fulfilment, whether of ideology or selfish ...